Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2023] ZAGPJHC 784

SB Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd v TS Tshantsha Attorneys (Pty) Ltd (04586/2022)

SB Guarantee Company (Pty) Ltd v TS Tshantsha Attorneys (Pty) Ltd (04586/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 784 (10 July 2023)

The High Court refused condonation for a late opposing affidavit and granted a provisional winding-up order against the respondent.

  • Company Liquidation
  • Condonation Of Late Filing
  • Notice Of Motion Irregularity
  • Joinder Of Surety
  • Certificate Of Balance
  • Bona Fide Dispute Of Debt
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZASCA 147

Van Heerden v Bronkhorst (846/19)

Van Heerden v Bronkhorst (846/19) [2020] ZASCA 147 (13 November 2020)

The majority held that the notice of motion, although a hybrid between forms 2 and 2(a), provided unequivocal notice of the hearing date and afforded all procedural rights. Service of the notice of hearing was effected via the electronic address provided by the appellant's attorneys, in accordance with the rules. The failure to receive the notice was due to internal affairs within the appellant's attorneys' office and did not constitute a procedural error or mistake in the proceedings. The appellant failed to provide a reasonable explanation for her default and did not establish a bona fide d…

  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Rule 42 Application
  • Notice Of Motion Irregularity
  • Common Law Good Cause
  • Wills Act Section 2 3
  • Service By Electronic Mail
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2018] ZAWCHC 185

McNeil and Another v Aspeling and Others (A85/18)

McNeil and Another v Aspeling and Others (A85/18) [2018] ZAWCHC 185 (28 June 2018)

The court found that the notice of motion in the eviction application was irregular and ambiguous, failing to comply with Rule 55(1)(f) of the Magistrates' Court Rules and section 4 of PIE. The notice did not properly inform the appellants of the time for opposition or the hearing date, and the grounds for eviction were not adequately set out. The procedure adopted deprived the appellants of a fair opportunity to present their case, and the default judgment was granted prematurely and contrary to the rules. Additionally, the appellants raised a bona fide defence regarding both procedural comp…

  • Eviction Procedure
  • Prevention Of Illegal Eviction Act
  • Default Judgment
  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Locus Standi
  • Notice Of Motion Irregularity
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.