De Fortier v Firstrand Bank Ltd and Others In Re Firstrand Bank Ltd v De Fortier (57489/2011)
De Fortier v Firstrand Bank Ltd and Others In Re Firstrand Bank Ltd v De Fortier (57489/2011) [2015] ZAGPPHC 823 (8 December 2015)
The court found that while service of the notice of attachment on the applicant's ex-husband constituted proper service on the owner, the notice of sale failed to adequately describe the property by omitting substantial features such as the guesthouse business and additional dwellings. This omission meant the kind of property being sold was not properly identified, resulting in non-compliance with Rule 46(7)(b). Furthermore, the respondents failed to provide satisfactory evidence that the notice of sale was affixed as required by Rule 46(7)(e), and the court concluded that this requirement wa…
Source excerpt
- Sale In Execution
- Service Of Process
- Rule 46 Uniform Rules
- Notice Of Sale
- Warrant Of Execution