Mthatha Mall (Pty) Ltd v Tititi Boutique (Pty) Ltd (In Liquidation) (521/2020) [2020] ZAECGHC 75 (30 June 2020)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
521/2020
Judge
G H Bloem
The court suspended an eviction application against a company in liquidation because no liquidator had been appointed and statutory notice could not yet be given.
Brandkor Beleggings (Edms) Bpk v Emerald Sky Trading 157 (Edms) Bpk en Anders (72272/2012) [2013] ZAGPPHC 133 (31 May 2013)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
72272/2012
Judge
Oosthuizen
The application is barred by section 359(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 because the applicant failed to give the required written notice to the liquidators before proceeding. The relevant date for the commencement of liquidation is the date the application was presented to the court, not the date the order was granted. The court order of 3 June 2011 granted the applicant only a personal right to claim transfer of the property, not a real right. The property therefore remained part of the insolvent estate and subject to the concursus creditorum. Even if the application were not barred proc…
Bouwer v Cassim NO and Another (30767/2005) [2006] ZAGPHC 232 (21 August 2006)
Court
High Courts - Gauteng
Case number
30767/2005
Judge
Murphy
The High Court upheld an exception because the plaintiff did not allege compliance with section 359(2) of the Companies Act in a liquidation-related claim.