Hennie's Sports Bar Pty (Ltd) v Ryall Trading CC and Another (045487/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 696 (27 June 2025)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
045487/2025
Judge
Nyathi
The High Court dismissed an urgent interdict application arising from a letter of intent to buy an aircraft, finding no enforceable right without a deadlock-breaking mechanism.
Maano Water (Pty) Ltd v Eskom Holdings SOC Limited (383/24) [2025] ZASCA 87 (12 June 2025)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
383/24
Judges
Matojane, Keightley, Phatshoane
The Court held that Eskom's decision to cancel the tender was an executive action, not administrative action, and thus not reviewable under PAJA but under the principle of legality. The tender documents expressly reserved Eskom's right to cancel the tender at any time prior to contract formation. Maano did not have an enforceable right to compel Eskom to continue negotiations until deadlock, as the relevant contractual clause was too vague and lacked a deadlock-breaking mechanism. The cancellation was rationally connected to Eskom's need to protect public funds in light of significant and unf…
Grcic v J and J Investments Pty Ltd and Others (2023/106860) [2024] ZAGPJHC 1035 (11 October 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2023/106860
Judge
S McCafferty
The High Court stayed a payment application pending ADR under a share-sale agreement, finding a real dispute about the payment clause and its arbitration route.
Abigak 1 General Trading & Investment CC v Gani and Another; Gani and Another v Balkin and Others (1184/16; 6620/16) [2017] ZAGPJHC 126 (5 May 2017)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
1184/16; 6620/16
Judge
A E Bham
High Court held that an oral pactum de contrahendo to sell land was unenforceable under the Alienation of Land Act, granting eviction and dismissing setting aside.
Loggenberg NO and Others v Maree and Others (2801/2016) [2016] ZAFSHC 205 (23 December 2016)
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Case number
2801/2016
Judge
JP Daffue
The court held that the oral agreement relied upon by the applicants for the transfer of the Weltevreden farms was void for non-compliance with section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act, which requires such agreements to be in writing and signed by the parties. The particulars of claim did not disclose a cause of action, as the essential terms of the alleged agreement, including the purchase price and financing arrangements, were either undefined or incapable of determination. The court further found that South African law does not recognise an agreement to negotiate a further agreement unle…
Poltimore Trading (Pty) Ltd v Naude and Others (16858/2011) [2013] ZAGPPHC 256 (27 August 2013)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
16858/2011
Judge
F G Preller
The High Court upheld an exception to particulars of claim, finding the pleaded contract was an unenforceable agreement to agree and struck the claim out with leave to amend.
Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Ltd v Blue Marine Properties CC and Another (3247/2009) [2011] ZAECGHC 69 (15 April 2011)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
3247/2009
Judge
Sandi
The High Court held that it could not compel signature of suretyship documents where the parties only agreed to negotiate future terms and no valid suretyship existed.
Amplats Management Services (Pty) Ltd. v van Jaarsveld (269/06) [2007] ZASCA 72; (2007) 28 ILJ 2669 (SCA) (31 May 2007)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
269/06
Judges
Scott, Nugent, Jafta, Mlambo, Musi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that no binding contract of permanent employment was proved and upheld the dismissal of the respondent’s damages claim.