Repas v Repas (A151/2022) [2023] ZAWCHC 24 (13 February 2023)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
A151/2022
Judges
Binns-Ward, Samela, Francis
Appeal allowed after the court found a bona fide dispute of fact over an alleged partnership and held the refusal to hear oral evidence was a misdirection.
Kruuse v Hillhouse (83/2015) [2015] ZAECGHC 96 (7 July 2015)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
83/2015
Judge
Plasket
Leave to appeal against summary judgment was dismissed. The court held that no bona fide defence was properly disclosed and the NCA registration argument failed.
Bedrock Drilling BK v Du Preez (32488/2012) [2015] ZAGPPHC 210 (20 April 2015)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
32488/2012
Judge
E.M. Kubushi
The High Court granted leave to appeal after finding reasonable prospects that another court may differ on whether the parties had a partnership or joint ownership.
Konsult One CC v Strategy Partners (Pty) Ltd (2607/10) [2013] ZAWCHC 55 (19 March 2013)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
2607/10
Judge
D M Davis
The High Court held that Konsult One failed to prove a tacit partnership with Strategy Partners over several agricultural projects and dismissed the application with costs.
Islam v Kabir (CA : 280/2010) [2011] ZAECGHC 9 (11 April 2011)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
CA : 280/2010
Judges
J.E Smith, A.E.B Dhlodhlo
The magistrate erred by granting eviction without resolving substantial disputes of fact regarding the nature of the parties' relationship and the appellant's right to occupy the premises. The evidence indicated that the parties were business partners and that the appellant had purchased the respondent's share and entered into a lease with the owner. The appellant established a legal right to remain in occupation. The application should have been dismissed, and the appeal succeeds.