Dinah N.O and Another v Iginla and Others (063768/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 914 (10 September 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
063768/2023
Judge
MG Mashaba
The High Court dismissed leave to appeal against confirmation of an interim interdict, holding the order was not final and the property had not yet transferred.
Boshoff v Tristar Custom Feeders (Pty) Ltd and Others (2033/2020) [2022] ZANCHC 61 (30 September 2022)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
2033/2020
Judge
Chwaro
The court found that Boshoff retained ownership of the calves at the time of the application, as he did not intend to pass ownership until full payment was received. This intention was communicated to his agent and, on the probabilities, to the buyer. The evidence established that Boshoff's business practice was to issue invoices only after payment and that he had a financial obligation due on 2 November 2020, reinforcing his intention to retain ownership. The respondents failed to lead evidence to the contrary and relied solely on documentation, which was insufficient to rebut Boshoff's vers…
SV Trading CC Virtual Production v Suliman and Another (19614/2021) [2021] ZAGPPHC 228 (10 May 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
19614/2021
Judge
E van der Schyff
The High Court held that a credit sale of business assets passed ownership on delivery, with no proved reservation of ownership, and ordered return of the attached assets.
Jennings v Cotterel N.O and Others (5091/2017) [2019] ZAECGHC 129 (17 December 2019)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
5091/2017
Judge
J.E Smith
The court found that the applicant's assertions regarding payment and the passing of ownership were wholly insufficient to defeat the respondents' claim based on the rei vindicatio. The allegations did not raise any genuine or bona fide disputes of fact regarding whether the respondents had established all the requisites for vindicatory relief on a balance of probabilities. Consequently, the court held that there were no prospects of another court finding differently and dismissed the application for leave to appeal with costs.
Strangprop (Pty) Ltd v Vasriawa and Another (6109/2010) [2011] ZAKZDHC 47 (21 September 2011)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
6109/2010
Judge
Seegobin
High Court exception case on whether a sale agreement’s alternative claims disclosed causes of action despite disputed suspensive conditions and encroachment remedies.
Mathenjwa NO and Others v Magudu Game Company (Pty) Ltd (258/08) [2009] ZASCA 57; 2010 (2) SA 26 (SCA) ; [2009] 4 All SA 15 (SCA) (28 May 2009)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
258/08
Judges
Streicher, Nugent, Lewis, Ponnan, Kroon
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondent owned the game in the reserve and had not lost ownership when access to the trust land was blocked.
Nyathi Company Limited v St. Francis Marine CC (AC05/2006) [2006] ZAWCHC 68 (2 June 2006)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
AC05/2006
Judge
D. Van Reenen
The High Court set aside the arrest of a catamaran, finding ownership had passed to the buyer after delivery and later conduct transformed the deal into credit sale.