Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Baumann v DB Fine Chemicals (Pty) Ltd and Another (Variation) (2024-032290) [2025] ZAGPPHC 432 (9 May 2025)
The High Court varied its earlier order under Rule 42(1)(b) to correct an omission by specifying that the costs are party and party costs on scale B.
Du Preez N.O obo Shabangu v MEC for Health, Gauteng (58051/2018) [2025] ZAGPPHC 465 (2 May 2025)
The High Court varied a prior order under Rule 42(1)(b) to correct a patent omission and include costs, including curator ad litem costs.
SB Guarantee Company (RF) Pty Ltd v Richardson and Another (Variation) (93741/20) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1385 (9 December 2024)
The High Court varied its earlier order under Rule 42(1)(b) to correct an omission and specify the amount for which an immovable property was declared executable.
FNB v Govsons Investment (7057/21; 22035/15) [2024] ZAGPPHC 23 (15 January 2024)
The court dismissed two unopposed applications to vary earlier orders under Rule 42(1), finding no proven error, ambiguity, or common mistake.
Victor and Another v Wonderhoek Farms (Pty) Ltd and Others (5049/2014) [2022] ZAFSHC 153 (10 June 2022)
The High Court dismissed a Rule 42(1)(b) application to vary an earlier order, holding there was no patent error or ambiguity in the grant of interim relief.
MEC for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, Western Cape Province In re: Minister for Mineral Resources and Swartland Municipality and Others and Maccsand (Pty) Ltd and The City of Cape Town and Others (CCT 102/11, 103/11) [2012] ZACC 10; 2012 (9) BCLR 947 (CC) (29 May 2012)
The Constitutional Court partly granted a Rule 42 application to correct a costs order in CCT 102/11, but refused to vary the costs order in CCT 103/11.
Explore more
