T.H v L.A.H (10554/20)
T.H v L.A.H (10554/20) [2020] ZAGPPHC 109 (6 February 2020)
The High Court held that a Rule 43 application was premature because no divorce summons had been issued. The application was dismissed, with each party ordered to pay own costs.
- Rule 43 Applications
- Pending Matrimonial Action Requirement
- Maintenance Pendente Lite
- Parental Responsibilities
- Costs In Family Law
- Rule-43-applications