Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Family And Children [2025] ZAGPJHC 92

S.J.M v S.J.K (034304/2023)

S.J.M v S.J.K (034304/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 92 (7 February 2025)

Divorce case on section 9(1) forfeiture led to a partial forfeiture of the defendant’s GEPF pension interest, with the plaintiff awarded 20%.

  • Divorce Act Section 9
  • Forfeiture Of Patrimonial Benefits
  • Pension Interest Division
  • Community Of Property
  • Customary Marriage
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2023] ZAFSHC 350

M.M.K v V.S.K (4324/2021)

M.M.K v V.S.K (4324/2021) [2023] ZAFSHC 350 (7 September 2023)

Divorce matter on pension forfeiture, maintenance, medical aid, and costs. The court awarded the plaintiff 25% of the defendant’s pension interest and refused maintenance and medical aid relief.

  • Divorce Act Section 9 Forfeiture
  • Pension Interest Division
  • Spousal Maintenance
  • Medical Aid Beneficiary
  • Costs In Divorce
  • Divorce-act-section-9-forfeiture
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2017] ZAECGHC 65

Z.M (born R) v M.M.M (CA129/15)

Z.M (born R) v M.M.M (CA129/15) [2017] ZAECGHC 65 (30 May 2017)

The court found no evidence that the joint estate had been divided and held that the appellant remained entitled to a fifty percent share of the respondent's pension interest as at the date of divorce. The respondent's alleged prior agreement was unenforceable and not proven. The claim for pension interest could be made after the divorce decree, provided the joint estate had not yet been divided. The regional magistrate's conclusion was incorrect, and the appeal was upheld. The divorce order was amended to specifically provide for the appellant's entitlement to fifty percent of the respondent…

  • Pension Interest Division
  • Divorce Act Section 7
  • Amendment Of Divorce Order
  • Division Of Joint Estate
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2016] ZAFSHC 163

Labuschagne v Labuschagne and Others (A9.2015)

Labuschagne v Labuschagne and Others (A9.2015) [2016] ZAFSHC 163 (22 September 2016)

The court found that the first respondent did not have sufficient information to formulate a sustainable cause of action for payment of her share of the appellant's pension benefits. The appellant's obstructive conduct and lack of cooperation, coupled with the failure of the second respondent to provide information, constituted exceptional circumstances justifying deviation from normal discovery procedures. The misnomer in the divorce order regarding the pension fund was deemed a patent error and did not affect the first respondent's entitlement, as the appellant was a member of the Transnet…

  • Pension Interest Division
  • Discovery Before Action
  • Exceptional Relief
  • Divorce Order Enforcement
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.