Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2023] ZAFSHC 86

Petrol Green Filling Station CC v VKB Fuels (Pty) Ltd and Others (3794/2022)

Petrol Green Filling Station CC v VKB Fuels (Pty) Ltd and Others (3794/2022) [2023] ZAFSHC 86 (22 March 2023)

The High Court removed an interdict application from the roll after finding the dispute was not ripe for hearing because fuel retailing had already stopped and licence validity issues were pending elsewhere.

  • Petroleum Products Amendment Act
  • Retail Licence
  • Interdict
  • Locus Standi
  • Internal Appeal
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2018] ZALMPPHC 44

Seralor (Pty) Ltd and Another v Compredox (Pty) Ltd and Others (8142/2017)

Seralor (Pty) Ltd and Another v Compredox (Pty) Ltd and Others (8142/2017) [2018] ZALMPPHC 44 (27 June 2018)

The court found that the lease agreements between the applicants and the 3rd, 4th and 5th respondents were valid and enforceable, as the death of the lessor did not terminate the lease and the rights passed to the heirs. The Petroleum Products Amendment Act does not prohibit the applicants from leasing or subletting the premises, as their intention was not to retail petroleum but to lease the properties. The respondents' interpretation of the Act was rejected, and their conduct amounted to unlawful interference with the applicants' contractual rights. The applicants proved a clear right to th…

  • Lease Agreements
  • Specific Performance
  • Interdict
  • Petroleum Products Amendment Act
  • Succession Of Contracts
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2017] ZACC 28

Snyders NO v Louistef (Pty) Ltd and Another (CCT311/16)

Snyders NO v Louistef (Pty) Ltd and Another (CCT311/16) [2017] ZACC 28; 2017 (6) SA 646 (CC); 2018 (1) BCLR 19 (CC) (3 August 2017)

The Constitutional Court held that the site licence under the Petroleum Products Amendment Act is an asset with commercial value, but its transfer is subject to statutory constraints: it may be transferred only to new lessees or new owners and cannot survive the termination of the lease. The High Court erred in finding a casus omissus and in concluding that the transfer provisions did not allow for a sale. The Supreme Court of Appeal was correct that the site licence had commercial value, but it exists only for a limited time and only for new lessees or owners. The applicant's argument was re…

  • Petroleum Products Amendment Act
  • Site Licence Transfer
  • Asset Nature Of Licence
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Statutory Interpretation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.