Mthethwa v S (Appeal) (AR8/2021) [2025] ZAKZPHC 44 (7 May 2025)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
AR8/2021
Judges
Henriques, Harrison
Appeal against murder and firearm convictions dismissed. The High Court upheld the trial court’s findings on assessors, identification evidence, alibi, and sentence.
Sibisi v S - Appeal (A286/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1793 (3 October 2023)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A286/2022
Judges
Retief, Bokako
The High Court reduced a sentence for unlawful possession of a prohibited firearm after finding the prescribed minimum was disproportionate in the circumstances.
S v Mdlalose (Sentence) (SS23-2018) [2022] ZAGPJHC 43 (12 January 2022)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
SS23-2018
Judge
Strydom
Sentence judgment in a multi-count murder and firearms case. The court imposed life imprisonment for two premeditated murders and concurrent terms for related offences.
S v Mdlalose (SS23/2018) [2021] ZAGPJHC 880 (6 December 2021)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
SS23/2018
Judge
Strydom
The High Court convicted Mluleki Welcome Mdlalose on multiple murder, firearm, and related charges, relying on eyewitness, ballistic, DNA, and cellphone evidence.
Bader v S (A122/2020) [2021] ZAGPPHC 633 (17 September 2021)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A122/2020
Judges
N V Khumalo, T V Raikane
The High Court dismissed Brian Bader’s appeal against convictions for firearm-related offences and assault, holding that the trial court’s factual findings were justified.
S v Olyn (K/S13/18) [2020] ZANCHC 64 (15 May 2020)
Court
Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
Case number
K/S13/18
Judge
Mamosebo
The High Court sentenced Willem Olyn to life imprisonment for murder and imposed additional concurrent terms for firearm, assault, theft, driving, and attempted murder counts.
S v Nogodama (CC20/2017) [2017] ZAECPEHC 50 (17 October 2017)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Case number
CC 20/2017
Judge
M Makaula
The court found that the offences committed by the accused were extremely serious and had a profound and lasting impact on the victims. The accused showed no remorse and his defence was rejected as a blatant lie. The personal circumstances of the accused, including his age, lack of previous convictions, and family responsibilities, were considered but found to be far outweighed by the seriousness of the offences and the interests of the community. The court held that there were no substantial and compelling circumstances to justify a deviation from the prescribed minimum sentence of life impr…