Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2021] ZAGPPHC 9

Vuma and Others v Executive Director: Independent Police Investigative Directorate and Another (49791/2018)

Vuma and Others v Executive Director: Independent Police Investigative Directorate and Another (49791/2018) [2021] ZAGPPHC 9; 2021 (1) SACR 621 (GP) (13 January 2021)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
49791/2018
Judge
N Davis

The court found that the applicants’ refusal to grant IPID access to the requested documents was not justified by law. Section 29(2) of the IPID Act imposes a clear duty on SAPS members to cooperate with IPID investigations, including producing relevant documents, regardless of their classification. The reliance on section 5(2) of the Intelligence Service Oversight Act was misplaced, as it does not create an absolute prohibition on disclosure and is directed at secrecy within the JSCI. The applicants failed to provide cogent reasons for the classification of the documents or for refusing decl…

Source excerpt

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Police Oversight
  • Classification Of Documents
  • Subpoena Review
  • National Security Exception
  • Failure To Comply With Statutory Duties
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2013] ZACC 33

Minister of Police and Others v Premier of the Western Cape and Others (CCT 13/13)

Minister of Police and Others v Premier of the Western Cape and Others (CCT 13/13) [2013] ZACC 33; 2013 (12) BCLR 1365 (CC); 2014 (1) SA 1 (CC) (1 October 2013)

Court
Constitutional Court
Case number
CCT 13/13
Judges
Moseneke, Mogoeng, Cameron, Froneman, Jafta, Madlanga, Mhlantla, Nkabinde, Skweyiya, Van der Westhuizen, Zondo

The Constitutional Court held that the Premier of the Western Cape was constitutionally empowered under section 206(5) to appoint a commission of inquiry into police inefficiency and breakdown in relations between the police and the Khayelitsha community, and that such a commission may lawfully exercise subpoena powers over members of the Police Service. The Court found that the Premier had complied with cooperative governance obligations through extensive engagement with the Minister and Commissioner prior to the commission's appointment. The terms of reference were found to be sufficiently…

Source excerpt

  • Provincial Executive Powers
  • Commission Of Inquiry
  • Police Oversight
  • Cooperative Governance
  • Subpoena Powers
  • Bill Of Rights Protection
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2013] ZAWCHC 216

Minister of Police and Others v Premier of the Western Cape and Others (21600/12)

Minister of Police and Others v Premier of the Western Cape and Others (21600/12) [2013] ZAWCHC 216 (14 January 2013)

Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
21600/12
Judges
N J Yekiso, J H M Traverso

The court found that the Premier of the Western Cape acted within her constitutional and statutory powers in establishing the commission of enquiry into police inefficiency and breakdown in relations in Khayelitsha. The Premier made repeated efforts to engage with the Provincial Commissioner, National Commissioner, and Minister, but received no substantive responses. The principle of co-operative governance was not violated, as the Premier's communications demonstrated good faith attempts at engagement. The commission's terms of reference were lawful, focused on systemic issues, and did not a…

Source excerpt

  • Provincial Executive Powers
  • Commission Of Enquiry
  • Cooperative Governance
  • Rationality Review
  • Interim Interdict
  • Police Oversight
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.