D.E.T v F.T (158730/2014)
D.E.T v F.T (158730/2014) [2023] ZAGPJHC 836 (27 July 2023)
The Court held that the appointment of a liquidator is not warranted where the dispute between the parties concerns entitlement and distribution proportions, rather than the identification or liquidation of assets. The liquidator's function is administrative and does not extend to resolving substantive disputes over entitlement. Since the parties' disagreement is about what each is entitled to, and not about the mode of liquidation or the existence of assets, the applicant has not made out a case for the appointment of a liquidator. The Court further noted that mediation could be beneficial,…
Source excerpt
- Matrimonial Estate Liquidation
- Appointment Of Liquidator
- Post Divorce Asset Distribution