S v Motong (CC61/2020)
S v Motong (CC61/2020) [2021] ZALMPPHC 70 (11 October 2021)
The court found that the State's case was based solely on circumstantial evidence and that the post-mortem report, while indicating death by blunt force trauma and neck congestion, did not conclusively establish that the accused caused the injuries. The forensic expert conceded that other inferences, such as accidental falls or medical conditions, could explain the death. The evidence of key State witnesses corroborated the accused's version, and the failure to call crucial witnesses further weakened the State's case. Considering the evidence in its totality, the court held that more than one…
Source excerpt
- Murder
- Circumstantial Evidence
- Burden Of Proof
- Benefit Of Doubt
- Post Mortem Evidence