Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 574

Johester and Others v Road Accident Fund (2020/23383)

Johester and Others v Road Accident Fund (2020/23383) [2024] ZAGPJHC 574 (12 June 2024)

The Court held that a party cannot be compelled to make an election to call expert witnesses or to comply with an undertaking in a pre-trial minute to call experts if it elects not to do so. Rule 36 does not impose a positive obligation to appoint experts, and non-compliance with such undertakings does not constitute non-compliance with the Rules justifying a striking out order under Rule 30A. The striking out of a defence is a drastic remedy and is only competent where expressly provided for in the Rules, such as Rule 21(4) and Rule 35(7). In the absence of such provision, less onerous remed…

  • Striking Out Of Defence
  • Rule 30a Application
  • Expert Evidence
  • Pre Trial Undertakings
  • Raf4 Form Compliance
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.