South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 2 court collections
Last checked: 9 Oct 2026, 19:18 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

24 Apr 2024

Civil Procedure [2024] ZALMPPHC 37

Empact Group v Merensky High School (8467/2022)

Empact Group v Merensky High School (8467/2022) [2024] ZALMPPHC 37 (24 April 2024)

Court: Limpopo High Court, Polokwane
Case number: 8467/2022
Judge: Ledwaba

The High Court dismissed Empact Group’s exception to Merensky High School’s counterclaim, finding the pleading was not vague or embarrassing and caused no serious prejudice.

Exception Procedure
Vague And Embarrassing Pleading
Alternative Claims
Prejudice In Pleading
Civil-procedure
Exception

Read case analysis

25 Aug 2016

Civil Procedure [2016] ZAECPEHC 42

RGT Smart Operations (Pty) Ltd v Verlag Automobil Wirtschaft (Pty) Ltd t/a Arvato South Africa (2446/2013)

RGT Smart Operations (Pty) Ltd v Verlag Automobil Wirtschaft (Pty) Ltd t/a Arvato South Africa (2446/2013) [2016] ZAECPEHC 42 (25 August 2016)

Court: Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth
Case number: 2446/2013
Judge: N G Beshe

The High Court granted leave to amend particulars of claim in an unlawful competition dispute, finding the amendments clarified an existing case and would not prejudice the defendant.

Leave To Amend Pleadings
Unlawful Competition
Confidential Information
Prejudice In Pleading
Costs Order
Leave-to-amend-pleadings

Read case analysis

Explore more

South Africa Case Law

Search and filter South Africa case law

Empact Group v Merensky High School (8467/2022)

RGT Smart Operations (Pty) Ltd v Verlag Automobil Wirtschaft (Pty) Ltd t/a Arvato South Africa (2446/2013)