Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPJHC 609

Tsutsa v City Power Johannesburg (Soc) Ltd (2024/068636)

Tsutsa v City Power Johannesburg (Soc) Ltd (2024/068636) [2024] ZAGPJHC 609 (27 June 2024)

The High Court granted interim relief restoring electricity to an applicant and her minor child, issuing a rule nisi after disputed allegations of meter tampering.

  • Interim Relief
  • Electricity Supply Dispute
  • Section 28 Constitution
  • Prima Facie Rights
  • Interim-relief
  • Electricity-supply-dispute
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2018] ZAGPJHC 456

SWDC Holdings (Pty) Limited v Buthelezi and Others (16494/2018)

SWDC Holdings (Pty) Limited v Buthelezi and Others (16494/2018) [2018] ZAGPJHC 456 (22 May 2018)

The High Court granted interim eviction relief under section 5 of PIE against three respondents, finding imminent danger, hardship in the applicant’s favour, and no effective alternative remedy.

  • Prevention Of Illegal Eviction Act
  • Urgent Eviction
  • Balance Of Hardship
  • Prima Facie Rights
  • Interim Interdict
  • Urgent-eviction
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2005] ZANWHC 11

Schoeman v Chairperson of the North-West Gambling Board and Others (1571/04)

Schoeman v Chairperson of the North-West Gambling Board and Others (1571/04) [2005] ZANWHC 11 (13 January 2005)

The High Court dismissed an urgent application to interdict seizure of gambling machines, holding the applicant had no prima facie right to possess them.

  • National Gambling Act Interpretation
  • Provincial Authorisation
  • Interim Interdict
  • Prima Facie Rights
  • Interim-interdict
  • Gambling-law
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2004] ZAGPJHC 1

Disney Enterprises, Inc v Griesel NO and Others (12003/04)

Disney Enterprises, Inc v Griesel NO and Others (12003/04) [2004] ZAGPJHC 1 (7 September 2004)

The court found that the first respondent was prima facie properly appointed to represent the estate and was entitled to institute proceedings. The respondent established a prima facie case of copyright infringement by showing that the applicant, through its licensing arrangements, may have caused or authorised the alleged infringing acts in South Africa. The applicant's arguments regarding lack of direct involvement and non-disclosure of material facts were insufficient to warrant setting aside the ex parte attachment order. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the respondent, not…

  • Attachment Ad Fundandam Jurisdictionem
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Ex Parte Applications
  • Prima Facie Rights
  • Non Disclosure Of Material Facts
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.