R.M.D v K.D (16995/22P)
R.M.D v K.D (16995/22P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 2 (13 January 2023)
The court found that the animosity and lack of cooperation between the parents had created unnecessary urgency and conflict, but the overriding consideration was the best interests of the minor child. Both parents were capable caregivers, but the child, being five years old and impressionable, required stability and a nurturing environment. The respondent, the mother, provided a settled home and a positive support system, and the psychologist's report raised concerns about the applicant's behaviour and unilateral decision-making. The court rejected the applicant's disparaging remarks about th…
Source excerpt
- Primary Residence Of Child
- Best Interests Of Child
- Custody Dispute
- Children S Act
- Parental Rights
- School Enrolment