Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
6 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAFSHC 180

Firstrand Mortgage Company (Rf) (Pty) Ltd v Tani (1342/2023)

Firstrand Mortgage Company (Rf) (Pty) Ltd v Tani (1342/2023) [2025] ZAFSHC 180 (18 June 2025)

The High Court declared a primary residence specially executable, accepted an updated sworn valuation, set a reserve price, and dismissed procedural objections.

  • Rule 46a Execution
  • Reserve Price Determination
  • National Credit Act Compliance
  • Mortgage Bond Enforcement
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Rule-46a-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAECMKHC 30

Nedbank Limited v Umvoti Traders 1006 CC and Another (1600/2022)

Nedbank Limited v Umvoti Traders 1006 CC and Another (1600/2022) [2025] ZAECMKHC 30 (18 March 2025)

The applicant satisfied the requirements of rule 46A for execution against the primary residence. The sheriff's nulla bona return confirmed no movable assets were available. The second respondent failed to provide sufficient evidence of alternative means to settle the debt, despite claiming improved financial circumstances and proposing a monthly payment plan. The court found the proposal inadequate and unsupported by evidence. The applicant's compliance with rule 46A and the lack of acceptable alternatives justified execution against the property. The reserve price was set at R 1,377,610, ca…

  • Rule 46a Execution
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Reserve Price Setting
  • Mortgage Enforcement
  • Judicial Oversight
  • Party And Party Costs
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAWCHC 49

Shabudin v Nedbank Limited and Others (18516/2021)

Shabudin v Nedbank Limited and Others (18516/2021) [2025] ZAWCHC 49 (18 February 2025)

The court found that Nedbank's version of events was supported by independent documentation and correspondence, and that the applicant had not played open cards with the court. The applicant repeatedly failed to comply with arrangements and proposals, and her request for a stay amounted to a plea for mercy rather than a demonstration of real and substantial injustice. The court held that Nedbank had acted reasonably and provided ample opportunities for the applicant to remedy her default. The requirements for a suspension of execution were not met, as the applicant's grounds were insufficient…

  • Stay Of Execution
  • Summary Judgment
  • Mortgage Bond Enforcement
  • Sale In Execution
  • Primary Residence Protection
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPJHC 35

Sithole v Body Corporate of Bondi (A3114/2022)

Sithole v Body Corporate of Bondi (A3114/2022) [2025] ZAGPJHC 35 (24 January 2025)

The court found that the Magistrate correctly applied section 66(1) of the Magistrates' Court Act and Rule 43A, having established that the appellant's primary residence was subject to execution only after all alternative means to satisfy the judgment debt were exhausted. The appellant failed to provide evidence of available movable assets or credible means to settle the debt. The procedural safeguards, including a reserve price and a suspension period, were deemed sufficient to protect the appellant's constitutional rights under section 26. The surplus from the sale would allow the appellant…

  • Execution Against Immovable Property
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Magistrates Court Act Section 66
  • Magistrates Court Rule 43a
  • Constitutional Right To Housing
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 1393

First Rand Bank Limited v Bila and Another (24283/2017)

First Rand Bank Limited v Bila and Another (24283/2017) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1393 (19 December 2024)

The High Court postponed a bank’s application to declare a primary residence specially executable, requiring a revised NCA notice and fresh service before re-enrolment.

  • National Credit Act
  • Special Execution
  • Arrears On Mortgage
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Postponement Sine Die
  • Special-execution
Read case analysis
Land And Property [2024] ZAFSHC 289

S B Guarantee Company (RF) (Pty) Ltd v Manyoni & Gija Investments CC and Another (790/2024)

S B Guarantee Company (RF) (Pty) Ltd v Manyoni & Gija Investments CC and Another (790/2024) [2024] ZAFSHC 289 (12 September 2024)

The High Court enforced a breached settlement order, granted judgment for the outstanding bond debt, and declared the mortgaged residential property specially executable.

  • Mortgage Enforcement
  • Sale In Execution
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Rule 46a Procedure
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Judicial Oversight
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 763

ABSA Bank Limited v Thondlana (29241/2017)

ABSA Bank Limited v Thondlana (29241/2017) [2024] ZAGPPHC 763 (24 July 2024)

The High Court declared the respondent’s home specially executable under rule 46A, set a reserve price, and found no credible alternative means to satisfy the debt.

  • Rule 46a Execution
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Reserve Price Determination
  • Default Judgment Enforcement
  • Constitutional Right To Housing
  • Rule-46a-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAECQBHC 46

Firstrand Bank Limited v Van Niekerk and Others (51/2020)

Firstrand Bank Limited v Van Niekerk and Others (51/2020) [2024] ZAECQBHC 46 (9 July 2024)

The High Court dismissed an application to declare the respondents’ home executable under Rule 46A, finding that execution would unfairly infringe their housing rights.

  • Rule 46a Executable Property
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Section 26 Right To Housing
  • Judgment Debt Enforcement
  • Rule-46a
  • Primary-residence-execution
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAGPPHC 623

Body Corporate of Old Trafford v Muronzi (016676/2023)

Body Corporate of Old Trafford v Muronzi (016676/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 623 (21 June 2024)

The High Court refused final sequestration, finding no practical advantage over execution and special circumstances arising from the risk of homelessness.

  • Insolvency Act Section 12
  • Advantage To Creditors
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Constitutional Right To Housing
  • Sectional Titles Act Embargo
  • Insolvency
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2024] ZAECMKHC 58

N.B v A.B and Another (3305/2023)

N.B v A.B and Another (3305/2023) [2024] ZAECMKHC 58 (31 May 2024)

The High Court declared the respondent’s immovable property specially executable under Rule 46A, set a reserve price of R650,000, and awarded costs.

  • Rule 46a Execution
  • Costs Orders Enforcement
  • Primary Residence Protection
  • Reserve Price Setting
  • Rule-46a-execution
  • Primary-residence-protection
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.