The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Californian orders for delivery of shares were not a money judgment or liquid document, so provisional sentence failed.
Organi Mark (PTY) Ltd v Akoodie and Another (11435/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1017 (19 December 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
11435/2020
Judge
E van der Schyff
The court held that the only connecting factor between the dispute and the South African High Court is the residence of the defendants. The cause of action arises solely under section 361 of the eSwatini Companies Act, which empowers only the High Court of eSwatini to grant the declaratory relief sought. There is no link between the company or the dispute and South Africa, nor is there any basis in South African law or contract for jurisdiction. The principle that foreign statutes have no extra-territorial effect applies, and the South African court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to grant…
S-W v S-W (14211/2008) [2008] ZAWCHC 324 (1 December 2008)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
14211/2008
Judge
Ndita
The court dismissed a jurisdictional challenge and held that the applicant had been ordinarily resident in Cape Town for more than a year under the Divorce Act.