Steenkamp and Another v Kysna Local Municipality and Another (A20/11)
Steenkamp and Another v Kysna Local Municipality and Another (A20/11) [2011] ZAWCHC 512 (22 August 2011)
The court found that the appellants had proved, on a balance of probabilities, that the noise emanating from the second respondent's premises was unreasonable and constituted an actionable nuisance. The disturbances, particularly early morning kitchen and staff noises, materially interfered with the appellants' comfort and enjoyment of their property in a quiet residential area. The second respondent failed to demonstrate that all reasonable steps had been taken to abate the nuisance, and the measures implemented were insufficient. The locality principle did not absolve the second respondent,…
Source excerpt
- Noise Nuisance
- Private Nuisance
- Municipal By Laws
- Environmental Conservation Act
- Interdictory Relief
- Reasonableness Test