Tragar Logistics CC v Concargo Supply Chain (Pty) Ltd (461/2021) [2023] ZAWCHC 213 (24 July 2023)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
461/2021
Judge
P. S. Van Zyl
The court dismissed an application to compel further discovery and production under Rule 35(3) and Rule 35(12), finding the requests speculative and unsupported.
Owners and Underwriters of the MV 'Smart' v National Ports Authority a Division of Transnet (SOC) Limited and Another (A11-2016) [2020] ZAKZDHC 9 (10 March 2020)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Durban
Case number
A11/2016
Judge
Lopes
The court found that the Owners' discovery process, though not strictly in accordance with Uniform rule 35(2), was reasonable and justified given the complexity and international nature of admiralty litigation. The affidavits provided sufficient detail and there was no evidence of undiscovered relevant documents. TNPA's application to compel further discovery failed as the Owners had complied adequately. The Owners' application for further and better discovery was granted in part, as the requested documents were relevant to the issues of institutional negligence and pilotage procedures, but l…
Tracklot General Trading (Pty) Ltd v Sethole and Another (7406/2015) [2016] ZAGPPHC 214 (23 March 2016)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
7406/2015
Judge
Olivier
The court held that the respondents must produce for inspection all documents referred to in the rule 35(12) notice that are in their possession or, if not, must make a reasonable effort to obtain them and provide an affidavit explaining any inability to do so. Privileged or irrelevant documents need not be produced if substantiated, but confidentiality alone is not a defence. The application to strike out was considered premature, and the appropriate relief is an order to compel production. The court exercised its discretion to balance the interests of both parties and ordered the respondent…