Mahasha v BT Interior Dsgn (Pty) Ltd (J867/15)
Mahasha v BT Interior Dsgn (Pty) Ltd (J867/15) [2018] ZALCJHB 438 (8 June 2018)
The Labour Court found that while it had jurisdiction to adjudicate the applicant's contractual damages claim under section 77A(3) of the BCEA, the applicant failed to prove entitlement to damages. The contract was subject to a probation period, and the applicant did not provide evidence that she would have passed probation and secured the full 31-month contract. Furthermore, no quantum of damages was substantiated, and there was no evidence of mitigation or actual loss. The prior CCMA settlement resolved the unfair dismissal dispute but did not bar the contractual claim. However, in the abse…
Source excerpt
- Breach Of Employment Contract
- Probation Period
- Damages Quantification
- Jurisdiction Of Labour Court
- Settlement Agreement