Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
South Africa decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Standard Bank Of South Africa Limited v Wilken NO and Others (2021/22884) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1110 (1 February 2023)
The court granted trustees leave to challenge Standard Bank’s attorneys’ authority under rule 7(1), finding good cause for the late notice and inadequate proof of authority.
Firstrand Bank Ltd v 39 Indaba Accommodation & Catering (Pty) Ltd (3062/2020) [2021] ZAFSHC 124 (17 May 2021)
The High Court authorised Firstrand Bank to perfect a notarial bond over the respondent’s livestock after finding valid authority, debt proof, and a sufficiently identifiable bond.
Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital Board v Soul Food Services and Others (2016/2532) [2016] ZAGPJHC 320 (23 November 2016)
An eviction application was dismissed because the applicant failed to prove locus standi and authority for its chairperson to launch the case.
Thushang Construction CC v Greater Tubatse Municipality (9834/2003) [2016] ZAGPPHC 557 (4 May 2016)
High Court judgment awarding Thushanang Construction CC payment for work on a municipal sports facility project, including disputed phase 2 earthworks.
Mothuloe Attorneys v Microzone Project CC and Others (1684/2009) [2016] ZANWHC 14 (21 April 2016)
The High Court dismissed an attorneys’ damages claim against the North West Housing Corporation and the MEC for failure to prove a valid contract, loss, and quantum.
Corplo 358 Close Corporation v Charters (844/2011) [2011] ZAECGHC 27 (1 July 2011)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie case for provisional sequestration. The authority of Mr Wicks to institute proceedings was accepted, as the respondent's challenge was tactical and unsupported by evidence. The respondent's denial of personal liability was unconvincing, given the pattern of cashing multiple dishonoured cheques and the lack of credible explanation for the anticipated inflows of funds. The respondent failed to rebut the inference of insolvency, and the applicant was not required to provide a detailed list of creditors or assets. The prospect that…
Source excerpt
Nedbank Ltd v Kruger (1896/2010) [2010] ZAECPEHC 64 (9 November 2010)
Summary judgment was granted to Nedbank in a credit-enforcement matter after the court found the defendant had not shown a bona fide defence.
Explore more
