Stoltz v Steenkamp (127/17)
Stoltz v Steenkamp (127/17) [2018] ZASCA 84 (31 May 2018)
Appeal over the sale price of a harvester dismissed. The court held the appellant failed to prove a R750,000 purchase price and accepted the respondent’s version.
- Purchase And Sale
- Oral Contract
- Proof Of Purchase Price
- Mutually Destructive Versions
- Purchase-and-sale
- Oral-contract