Mzimela v Absa Bank Limited and Others (6960/2016)
Mzimela v Absa Bank Limited and Others (6960/2016) [2016] ZAKZDHC 27 (10 August 2016)
The court held that the sale-in-execution advertisement complied with rule 46(7)(b) despite not listing every feature of the property, and dismissed the application with costs.
- Sale In Execution
- Rule 46 Compliance
- Property Description In Auction
- Prejudice To Debtor
- Sale-in-execution
- Rule-46-compliance