Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2017] ZALMPTHC 10

Tshikovhi v Nemathithi (A09/2015)

Tshikovhi v Nemathithi (A09/2015) [2017] ZALMPTHC 10 (28 August 2017)

Appeal over stopped cheque payments and an alleged settlement agreement was dismissed. The court held no valid settlement was proven and no replication was required.

  • Cheque Payment Dispute
  • Replication Requirement
  • Settlement Agreement
  • Property Sale
  • Pleadings
  • Costs Award
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2002] ZAWCHC 19

New Adventure Investments 193 (PTY) Ltd v Trustees for the time being of the SAS Trust (2577/1999)

New Adventure Investments 193 (PTY) Ltd v Trustees for the time being of the SAS Trust (2577/1999) [2002] ZAWCHC 19; [2002] 3 All SA 544 (C) (22 April 2002)

The court found that the defendant, through Mr Stevenson, acquired exclusive knowledge of the application for departure from zoning regulations for a proposed multi-storey development on the neighbouring property prior to the sale. This information was material to the plaintiff's decision to purchase, given the property's panoramic views. The defendant deliberately withheld this information, intending to induce the plaintiff to contract. The court rejected the defendant's argument that the information was equally accessible or ascertainable by ordinary diligence, holding that the exception to…

  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • Duty To Disclose
  • Material Non Disclosure
  • Contract Cancellation
  • Property Sale
  • Reconventional Claim
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1991] ZASCA 186

Dirk Swart (Eidendoms) Bpk. v Tommar Beleggings BK (238/90)

Dirk Swart (Eidendoms) Bpk. v Tommar Beleggings BK (238/90) [1991] ZASCA 186 (29 November 1991)

The Supreme Court of Appeal found that the appellant had received a mandate to sell both the immovable property and the hotel business. The evidence showed that the appellant's introduction of the property to the Department of Public Works was the direct and effective cause of the subsequent negotiations and voluntary agreement to sell. The expropriation was used solely as a mechanism to expedite payment at the request of the respondent, and did not alter the fundamentally consensual nature of the transaction. The court distinguished the present facts from the John Wilkinson case, noting that…

  • Estate Agent Commission
  • Effective Cause
  • Expropriation
  • Mandate
  • Property Sale
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.