Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
5 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2023] ZALCCT 65

Dotsure Limited v Roux and Another (C586/2023)

Dotsure Limited v Roux and Another (C586/2023) [2023] ZALCCT 65 (7 December 2023)

The Labour Court dismissed Dotsure’s urgent application to enforce a restraint of trade and confidentiality undertakings against a former employee.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Employment Contracts
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Enforceability Of Contracts
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2022] ZAGPJHC 312

Gauteng Boxing Promotors Association and Another v Wysoke (2022/11789)

Gauteng Boxing Promotors Association and Another v Wysoke (2022/11789) [2022] ZAGPJHC 312 (26 April 2022)

The High Court found a restraint of trade against a former employee unreasonable because it covered all of South Africa and was too broad to justify enforcement.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Enforceability Of Contracts
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Public Policy
  • Balance Of Interests
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2020] ZAGPJHC 116

Compressor Valves and Accessories (Pty) Limited v Thackeray (43240/2019)

Compressor Valves and Accessories (Pty) Limited v Thackeray (43240/2019) [2020] ZAGPJHC 116 (30 March 2020)

The High Court found a restraint of trade unenforceable where it was imposed after employment began and signed under duress, and dismissed the application.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Enforceability Of Contracts
  • Duress
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Public Policy
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZAGPJHC 140

Pam Golding Properties (Pty) Ltd v Greef and Another (2018/17635)

Pam Golding Properties (Pty) Ltd v Greef and Another (2018/17635) [2018] ZAGPJHC 140 (18 May 2018)

High Court granted an urgent interdict enforcing a six-month restraint of trade and confidentiality clause against a former estate agent in Bryanston.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Final Interdict
  • Employment Contract
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZAGPJHC 433

Pam Golding Properties (Pty) Ltd v Greef and Another (2018/17635)

Pam Golding Properties (Pty) Ltd v Greef and Another (2018/17635) [2018] ZAGPJHC 433 (18 May 2018)

The High Court enforced a six-month restraint of trade and confidentiality clause against a former estate agent, protecting the employer’s client lists and business information.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Final Interdict
  • Employment Contract
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZAGPPHC 570

Dr DM De Jongh & Associates No. 64 Incorporated v Botha and Another (34071/2017)

Dr DM De Jongh & Associates No. 64 Incorporated v Botha and Another (34071/2017) [2018] ZAGPPHC 570 (13 April 2018)

High Court matter on a medical restraint of trade: the court found a valid proprietary interest, but held the three-year restraint excessive and granted no interdict.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Consultancy Agreement
  • Enforceability Of Contracts
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Springboard Doctrine
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2018] ZAGPJHC 56

Micah Kitchens CC v Botha and Others (2018/3463)

Micah Kitchens CC v Botha and Others (2018/3463) [2018] ZAGPJHC 56 (19 February 2018)

The court held that the restraint of trade covenants did not prohibit mere employment by a competitor, but only competitive conduct by the employee. Micah Kitchens CC failed to establish that any of the employee respondents were competing with it in the field of corporate work through their employment with Alto Kitchens (Pty) Ltd. The applicant also failed to demonstrate a proprietary interest worthy of protection, as the alleged confidential information and customer relationships were either not proven or not protectable. The claims against the fourth and fifth respondents failed as they wer…

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Confidential Information
  • Employment Contracts
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2017] ZAGPJHC 219

Pam Golding Properties (Pty) Ltd v Neille (26039/17)

Pam Golding Properties (Pty) Ltd v Neille (26039/17) [2017] ZAGPJHC 219 (28 July 2017)

The court found that the applicant has a protectable interest in its confidential information and customer connections, including its database of sellers and buyers, which are proprietary assets. The respondent admitted to accessing and contacting clients from this database, constituting a breach of the restraint. However, the court held that the restraint as originally formulated was overbroad in duration, given the nature of the residential property market, the short lifespan of customer connections, and the lack of exclusive mandates. The court limited the restraint to three months, findin…

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Customer Connections
  • Reasonableness Of Restriction
  • Enforceability Of Restraint
  • Proprietary Interest
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2017] ZALCJHB 8

PB Hairdressing Organisation (Pty) Ltd t/a Carlton Hair International v Vinciguerra and Another (J2948/16)

PB Hairdressing Organisation (Pty) Ltd t/a Carlton Hair International v Vinciguerra and Another (J2948/16) [2017] ZALCJHB 8 (16 January 2017)

The Labour Court dismissed an urgent application to enforce a restraint of trade against a junior hair stylist, finding the restraint unreasonable and against public policy.

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Employment Contracts
  • Proprietary Interest
  • Public Policy
  • Customer Connections
  • Restraint-of-trade
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2016] ZAFSHC 107

Metro Limited and Another v Fenwick and Others (4927/2015)

Metro Limited and Another v Fenwick and Others (4927/2015) [2016] ZAFSHC 107 (17 June 2016)

The court found that the applicants had established proprietary interests worthy of protection, including trade secrets, customer and supplier connections, and confidential information. The respondents failed to provide substantive answers or countervailing evidence to the allegations, relying instead on bald denials and technical objections that were abandoned. The restraint of trade clauses were found to be valid and reasonable in duration and scope, and the respondents' conduct in setting up a competing business and approaching applicants' customers and suppliers constituted breaches of th…

  • Restraint Of Trade
  • Confidential Information
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Employment Contracts
  • Proprietary Interest
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.