Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Environmental Law [2023] ZAGPPHC 310

Endangered Wildlife Trust and Another v Director General: Department of Water and Sanitation (Acting) and Another

Endangered Wildlife Trust and Another v Director General: Department of Water and Sanitation (Acting) and Another [2023] ZAGPPHC 310; A155/2019 (10 May 2023)

The court found that the Water Tribunal had properly considered and balanced all relevant statutory and constitutional factors, including environmental sensitivity, strategic water source status, mitigation measures, and socio-economic impacts. The Tribunal did not err in law regarding the requirement for landowner consent, the application of the precautionary principle, or the provision for post-closure water treatment. The Tribunal's decision was informed by expert evidence, public participation, and compliance with national policy and legislative frameworks. The precautionary principle was…

  • Water Use Licence
  • Precautionary Principle
  • Protected Areas
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Sustainable Development
  • Mining Authorisation
Read case analysis
Environmental Law [2017] ZASCA 9

Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency and Another v Baberton Mines (Pty) Ltd and Others (216/2016)

Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency and Another v Baberton Mines (Pty) Ltd and Others (216/2016) [2017] ZASCA 9; [2017] 2 All SA 376 (SCA); 2017 (5) SA 62 (SCA) (14 March 2017)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the 1996 Proclamation validly designated the Barberton Nature Reserve as a conservation area under provincial legislation, meeting the requirements of section 12 of NEMPAA. The court found that the area was indicated with sufficient certainty and that the High Court took an unduly narrow approach to the interpretation of the relevant proclamations and statutory provisions. As a result, the prospecting area falls within the protection afforded by section 48(1) of NEMPAA, prohibiting prospecting activities. The appeal was upheld, and Barberton Mines' applic…

  • Protected Areas
  • Prospecting Rights
  • Nature Reserve Designation
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Mineral And Petroleum Resources Development Act
  • National Environmental Management Protected Areas Act
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.