Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2024] ZAWCHC 223

B.T v S (A 118/2024)

B.T v S (A 118/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 223 (31 July 2024)

The court found that the appellant failed to discharge the onus of proving exceptional circumstances justifying release on bail for Schedule 6 offences. The magistrate's refusal of bail was based on multiple factors: the risk to the complainant's safety, likelihood of intimidation, history of domestic violence, and manipulative conduct by the appellant. The court held that the new facts presented—mental health deterioration and employment loss—were either not sufficiently exceptional or were available at the time of the initial bail application and thus not truly new. The psychologist's repor…

  • Bail Application
  • Exceptional Circumstances
  • Domestic Violence
  • Presumption Of Innocence
  • Mental Health In Custody
  • Protection Orders
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2023] ZAGPJHC 1090

L.L v M.C.L (038505/2023)

L.L v M.C.L (038505/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1090 (28 September 2023)

The High Court dismissed an application to declare a spouse a vexatious litigant, finding insufficient proof that the challenged proceedings were without merit.

  • Vexatious Litigation
  • Divorce Proceedings
  • Maintenance Applications
  • Protection Orders
  • Vexatious-litigation
  • Divorce-proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2021] ZAGPJHC 610

Omar v Amod (7087/2020)

Omar v Amod (7087/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 610 (6 September 2021)

The court found that the respondent had persistently instituted legal proceedings against the applicant and her family without reasonable grounds, amounting to harassment and abuse of process. The respondent's actions were not motivated by legitimate legal claims but rather by an improper purpose, namely to pressure the applicant into conceding primary care of the minor child and to inflict financial and psychological harm. The respondent's self-representation enabled him to pursue multifarious applications at little personal cost, while the applicant was forced to expend significant resource…

  • Vexatious Litigation
  • Protection Orders
  • Child Care And Contact
  • Abuse Of Process
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.