Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2024] ZALCJHB 45

Pedra v Wisium SA (Pty) Ltd (JS550/17)

Pedra v Wisium SA (Pty) Ltd (JS550/17) [2024] ZALCJHB 45 (26 January 2024)

The Court found that the applicant's employment contract bound him to all company policies and the rules of the Old Mutual Provident Fund, which stipulated a normal retirement age of 60 for management employees. The evidence established that the retirement policy was accessible and known to the applicant, and that the respondent followed its policy and procedure in effecting the dismissal. The applicant failed to establish any differential treatment or unfair discrimination, and section 187(2)(b) of the LRA applied, rendering the dismissal not automatically unfair. The applicant's version was…

  • Automatic Unfair Dismissal
  • Retirement Policy
  • Normal Retirement Age
  • Unfair Discrimination
  • Employment Contract
  • Provident Fund Rules
Read case analysis
Labour Law [2009] ZALAC 18

SA Metal & Machinery Co (Pty) Ltd v Gamaroff (CA 4/2007)

SA Metal & Machinery Co (Pty) Ltd v Gamaroff (CA 4/2007) [2009] ZALAC 18; [2010] 2 BLLR 136 (LAC) (5 August 2009)

The Labour Appeal Court held that the respondent was fairly dismissed after reaching the applicable retirement age of 65 under the fund rules.

  • Retirement Age
  • Automatic Unfair Dismissal
  • Section 187 Lra
  • Provident Fund Rules
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Employment Contract Terms
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.