Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Delict [2025] ZAGPPHC 46

T.M v Minister of Police (33413/2015)

T.M v Minister of Police (33413/2015) [2025] ZAGPPHC 46 (21 January 2025)

The High Court held that the plaintiff made out a case that he witnessed police assault and humiliate his father, causing emotional shock and psychological trauma.

  • Emotional Shock
  • Psychological Trauma
  • Police Assault
  • Humiliation
  • Unlawful Arrest
  • Emotional-shock
Read case analysis
Delict [2017] ZAGPPHC 197

Bekker v Minister of Police (1077/15)

Bekker v Minister of Police (1077/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 197 (18 May 2017)

The court dismissed Bekker’s claim for emotional shock and psychological trauma after finding he had not proved he witnessed the alleged police assault.

  • Emotional Shock
  • Psychological Trauma
  • Witnessing Assault
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Damages
  • Delict
Read case analysis
Delict [2014] ZAGPJHC 108

Ngakane v Member for the Executive Council for Health (Gauteng Provicial Government) and Others (2010/02456)

Ngakane v Member for the Executive Council for Health (Gauteng Provicial Government) and Others (2010/02456) [2014] ZAGPJHC 108 (30 April 2014)

The High Court upheld a special plea of prescription and dismissed a delictual damages claim arising from the handling of a deceased father's corpse.

  • Prescription Act
  • Psychological Trauma
  • Unlawful Withholding Of Information
  • Prescription
  • Delict
  • Deceased-remains
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2010] ZAECPEHC 66

S v Ntobela

S v Ntobela [2010] ZAECPEHC 66 (10 November 2010)

The court held that the sentence of life imprisonment was entirely proportionate to the crime committed, given the premeditated nature of the rape, the tender age of the complainant, and the severe psychological trauma inflicted. The appellant's lack of remorse and the circumstances of the offence did not present substantial and compelling reasons to depart from the prescribed minimum sentence. The sentencing court properly applied the principles set out in S v Malgas, and there was no basis for appellate interference.

  • Minimum Sentencing
  • Rape Of Minor
  • Substantial And Compelling Circumstances
  • Psychological Trauma
  • Premeditation
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.