British American Tobacco South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Health (463/2011) [2012] ZASCA 107; [2012] 3 All SA 593 (SCA) (20 June 2012)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
463/2011
Judges
Mthiyane, Farlam, Malan, Tshiqi, McLaren
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that s 3(1)(a) of the Tobacco Products Control Act, as amended, does limit the right to freedom of expression for tobacco manufacturers and consumers by prohibiting advertising and promotion, including one-to-one communications. However, this limitation is reasonable and justifiable under s 36(1) of the Constitution, given the compelling public health interests, South Africa's international obligations under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, and the need to protect citizens from the harmful effects of tobacco. The Court found that less restricti…
Treatment Action Campaign and Another v Rath and Others (12156/05) [2008] ZAWCHC 34; [2008] 4 All SA 360 (C) (13 June 2008)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
12156/05
Judge
Zondi
The court found that VitaCell, distributed by the Rath respondents, qualifies as a 'medicine' under the Medicines Act due to the medicinal claims made about its efficacy in treating AIDS. The supply of VitaCell to SANCO constitutes a sale under the Act, even if no consideration is received. However, VitaCell is not subject to mandatory registration as a medicine under the 2002 call-up notice, which only initiates a process for potential registration. The Rath respondents conducted clinical trials without authorisation, which is unlawful under the Medicines Act and its regulations. The adverti…
Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others (No 1) (CCT9/02) [2002] ZACC 16; 2002 (5) SA 703; 2002 (10) BCLR 1075 (5 July 2002)