Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2023] ZAGPPHC 666

IPA Foundation (NPC) v South African Pharmacy Council and Others (7452/2022)

IPA Foundation (NPC) v South African Pharmacy Council and Others (7452/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 666 (14 August 2023)

The High Court dismissed a review of the SAPC's decision to implement PIMART, finding adequate notice, lawful authority, and no procedural unfairness.

  • Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
  • Scope Of Practice
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Ultra Vires
  • Public Health Policy
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2012] ZASCA 107

British American Tobacco South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Health (463/2011)

British American Tobacco South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Health (463/2011) [2012] ZASCA 107; [2012] 3 All SA 593 (SCA) (20 June 2012)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that s 3(1)(a) of the Tobacco Products Control Act, as amended, does limit the right to freedom of expression for tobacco manufacturers and consumers by prohibiting advertising and promotion, including one-to-one communications. However, this limitation is reasonable and justifiable under s 36(1) of the Constitution, given the compelling public health interests, South Africa's international obligations under the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, and the need to protect citizens from the harmful effects of tobacco. The Court found that less restricti…

  • Freedom Of Expression
  • Commercial Speech
  • Tobacco Advertising Regulation
  • Bill Of Rights Limitation
  • Public Health Policy
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2008] ZAWCHC 34

Treatment Action Campaign and Another v Rath and Others (12156/05)

Treatment Action Campaign and Another v Rath and Others (12156/05) [2008] ZAWCHC 34; [2008] 4 All SA 360 (C) (13 June 2008)

The court found that VitaCell, distributed by the Rath respondents, qualifies as a 'medicine' under the Medicines Act due to the medicinal claims made about its efficacy in treating AIDS. The supply of VitaCell to SANCO constitutes a sale under the Act, even if no consideration is received. However, VitaCell is not subject to mandatory registration as a medicine under the 2002 call-up notice, which only initiates a process for potential registration. The Rath respondents conducted clinical trials without authorisation, which is unlawful under the Medicines Act and its regulations. The adverti…

  • Medicines And Related Substances Act
  • Clinical Trials Regulation
  • False Advertising
  • Ministerial Duties
  • Judicial Review
  • Public Health Policy
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2002] ZACC 16

Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others (No 1) (CCT9/02)

Minister of Health and Others v Treatment Action Campaign and Others (No 1) (CCT9/02) [2002] ZACC 16; 2002 (5) SA 703; 2002 (10) BCLR 1075 (5 July 2002)

The Constitutional Court dismissed an appeal against an interim execution order requiring limited Nevirapine access pending the main appeal.

  • Interim Execution Orders
  • Bill Of Rights Remedies
  • Separation Of Powers
  • Interests Of Justice
  • Public Health Policy
  • Interim-execution-orders
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.