Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Competition Law [2021] ZACT 70

Dischem Pharmacies Limited v Pure Pharmacy Holdings Proprietary Limited (LM181Jan21)

Dischem Pharmacies Limited v Pure Pharmacy Holdings Proprietary Limited (LM181Jan21) [2021] ZACT 70 (19 October 2021)

The Competition Tribunal conditionally approved Dis-Chem’s acquisition of Pure Pharmacy Holdings, subject to conditions on future merger notifications, telemedicine access, and employment.

  • Horizontal Merger
  • Vertical Merger
  • Market Concentration
  • Creeping Merger
  • Failing Firm
  • Public Interest Retrenchment
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2019] ZACT 12

AAF Energy Ltd and Weijo Investments (Pty) Ltd v Quest Petroleum (Pty) Ltd, Montidox (Pty) Ltd, Quest Lubricants (Pty) Ltd and On Route Convenience (Pty) Ltd (LM1940ct18)

AAF Energy Ltd and Weijo Investments (Pty) Ltd v Quest Petroleum (Pty) Ltd, Montidox (Pty) Ltd, Quest Lubricants (Pty) Ltd and On Route Convenience (Pty) Ltd (LM1940ct18) [2019] ZACT 12 (11 March 2019)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved the merger between AAF Energy, Weijo and the Quest firms, finding no substantial competition concerns and addressing retrenchment undertakings.

  • Merger Control
  • Public Interest Retrenchment
  • Market Share Analysis
  • Horizontal Overlap
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2009] ZACT 49

Bidpaper Plus (Pty) Ltd v Pretoria Wholesale Stationers (Pty) Ltd (03/LM/Jan09)

Bidpaper Plus (Pty) Ltd v Pretoria Wholesale Stationers (Pty) Ltd (03/LM/Jan09) [2009] ZACT 49; [2009] 2 CPLR 386 (CT) (17 July 2009)

The Tribunal conditionally approved Bidpaper Plus’s acquisition of Pretoria Wholesale Stationers, finding no substantial competition harm and limiting retrenchments to 24.

  • Merger Control
  • Market Concentration
  • Vertical Integration
  • Public Interest Retrenchment
  • Merger-control
  • Market-concentration
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2005] ZACT 6

Citibank NA South Africa Branch and Mercantile Bank Limited (91/LM/Nov04)

Citibank NA South Africa Branch and Mercantile Bank Limited (91/LM/Nov04) [2005] ZACT 6 (17 January 2005)

The Competition Tribunal approved Citibank’s acquisition of part of Mercantile’s asset finance book unconditionally and confirmed an agreed R100,000 penalty.

  • Merger Notification
  • Acquisition Of Control
  • Administrative Penalty
  • Market Definition
  • Public Interest Retrenchment
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis
Competition Law [2004] ZACT 4

Nedbank Limited and Retail Brands Interafrica (Pty) Ltd and Continental Beverages (Pty) Ltd / Retail Brands Interafrica (Pty) Ltd (71/LM/Dec03)

Nedbank Limited and Retail Brands Interafrica (Pty) Ltd and Continental Beverages (Pty) Ltd / Retail Brands Interafrica (Pty) Ltd (71/LM/Dec03) [2004] ZACT 4 (27 January 2004)

The Competition Tribunal unconditionally approved Nedbank’s merger with two Rouxcor subsidiaries, finding no substantial competition concerns and noting public-interest retrenchments.

  • Large Merger Review
  • Public Interest Retrenchment
  • Substantial Lessening Of Competition
  • Unconditional Approval
  • Merger-control
  • Competition-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.