Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2006] ZAGPHC 197

Fullimput 221 CC t/a Hawk Momlaba Luxury Tours v Sono and Another, Fullimput 221 CC t/a Hawk Momlaba Luxury Tours v Minister of Safety and Security and Others (7215/06, 11712/06)

Fullimput 221 CC t/a Hawk Momlaba Luxury Tours v Sono and Another, Fullimput 221 CC t/a Hawk Momlaba Luxury Tours v Minister of Safety and Security and Others (7215/06, 11712/06) [2006] ZAGPHC 197; 2006 (10) BCLR 1202 (T) (18 May 2006)

The applicant established a clear right to operate its bus service under valid permits and to have its employees and passengers protected from violence and intimidation. The respondents' conduct, including threats, obstruction, and physical violence, constituted unlawful interference and contempt of previous court orders. The sixth respondent's denial was insufficient, and the seventh respondent's failure to answer led to a finding of contempt. The police failed in their constitutional and statutory duties by not intervening or enforcing the law, justifying a mandamus compelling investigation…

  • Interdict
  • Contempt Of Court
  • Mandamus
  • Bill Of Rights Protection
  • Public Transport Permits
  • Police Duties
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1995] ZASCA 105

Bophuthatswana Transport Holdings (Edms) Bpk. v Matthysen Busvervoer (Edms) Bpk (119/94)

Bophuthatswana Transport Holdings (Edms) Bpk. v Matthysen Busvervoer (Edms) Bpk (119/94) [1995] ZASCA 105; 1996 (2) SA 166 (SCA); (21 September 1995)

The court held that Matthysen lacked the necessary standing to interdict BTH over alleged unpermitted transport operations and upheld the appeal.

  • Public Transport Permits
  • Unlawful Competition
  • Locus Standi
  • Interdict
  • Tender Conditions
  • Locus-standi
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [1985] ZASCA 121

Setsokotsane Busdiens (Edms) Bpk v Voorsitter van die Nasionale Vervoerkommissie en 'n Ander (61/84)

Setsokotsane Busdiens (Edms) Bpk v Voorsitter van die Nasionale Vervoerkommissie en 'n Ander (61/84) [1985] ZASCA 121 (21 November 1985)

The appeal succeeded because the Commission gave a misleading permit notice and the delay in seeking review was not unreasonable in the circumstances.

  • Review Of Administrative Action
  • Public Transport Permits
  • Delay In Instituting Review
  • Procedural Fairness
  • Standing Of Interested Parties
  • Administrative-law
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.