Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Delict [2023] ZAWCHC 254

August v Maimane (20866/2018; 20867/2018; 20868/2023; 20869/2018)

August v Maimane (20866/2018; 20867/2018; 20868/2023; 20869/2018) [2023] ZAWCHC 254 (13 October 2023)

Consolidated defamation trial over statements linking former DA councillors to corruption; the court awarded damages and attorney-and-client costs.

  • Defamation
  • Quantum Of Damages
  • Apology And Retraction
  • Publication Of Defamatory Statements
  • Attorney And Client Costs
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Delict [2022] ZAGPPHC 793

De Wet and Others v Scheepers (21021/2020)

De Wet and Others v Scheepers (21021/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 793 (27 October 2022)

The High Court held that the defendant defamed two attorneys by accusing them of fraud and collusion over a deceased estate sale, awarding each R50,000 in damages.

  • Defamation
  • Damages Quantification
  • Professional Reputation
  • Publication Of Defamatory Statements
  • Damages
  • Professional-reputation
Read case analysis
Delict [2021] ZANCHC 30

Engelbrecht v Van Der Merwe (2415/18)

Engelbrecht v Van Der Merwe (2415/18) [2021] ZANCHC 30 (23 July 2021)

High Court defamation judgment over emails accusing an attorney-trustee of dishonesty, corruption and incompetence; damages of R800,000 were awarded.

  • Defamation
  • Damages Assessment
  • Publication Of Defamatory Statements
  • Intentional Wrongdoing
  • Protection From Harassment Act
  • Damages
Read case analysis
Delict [2016] ZAWCHC 85

Van Gijsen v Van Der Merwe (14860/13)

Van Gijsen v Van Der Merwe (14860/13) [2016] ZAWCHC 85 (24 June 2016)

The court found that the defendant published multiple emails to various third parties, including officials and professionals, containing serious allegations of dishonesty, fraud, theft, tax evasion, and other criminal conduct against the plaintiff. These statements were per se defamatory and intended to injure the plaintiff's reputation. The defendant failed to plead or prove any justification, privilege, or truth, and did not rebut the presumptions of unlawfulness and intent. The defendant persisted in his conduct over a prolonged period, even after warnings and an interim interdict, aggrava…

  • Defamation
  • Actio Iniuriarum
  • Damages For Injury To Reputation
  • Publication Of Defamatory Statements
  • Animus Iniuriandi
  • Privilege And Justification
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2008] ZAGPHC 348

Chen and Another v China Express SA (Pty) Ltd and Others (11821/07)

Chen and Another v China Express SA (Pty) Ltd and Others (11821/07) [2008] ZAGPHC 348 (17 June 2008)

The High Court made final a rule nisi interdicting respondents from alleging fraud or publishing defamatory claims about the applicants.

  • Final Interdict
  • Defamation
  • Reasonable Apprehension Of Injury
  • Publication Of Defamatory Statements
  • Final-interdict
  • Reasonable-apprehension-of-injury
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.