Cartello Motors CC v Styger (054884/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1247 (2 December 2024)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
054884/2023
Judge
E van der Schyff
The court granted a punitive costs order after the respondent disposed of disputed property during litigation, frustrating the applicant’s vindicatory claim.
Nene v National Lotteries Commission and Others (2024/024114) [2024] ZAGPJHC 385; (2024) 45 ILJ 1334 (GJ) (22 April 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
2024/024114
Judge
S D J Wilson
The court struck an urgent interdict application from the roll and ordered punitive costs, finding no legally recognisable case or proper basis for urgency.
T.R v S.M (035901/2023) [2024] ZAGPJHC 150 (21 February 2024)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
035901/2023
Judge
Mahomed
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The issues regarding relocation had become moot as the respondent was no longer relocating, and the minor child would remain in her current location. The applicant did not provide substantive reasons or evidence why relocation was not in the child's best interests, nor did he obtain a family advocate's report. The court held that there were no genuine disputes of fact requiring referral to trial and that the applicant's access rights were adequately considered and provided for in the judgme…
Westhills 379 Development (Pty) Limited v Buntu Foods (Pty) Ltd (32500/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 910 (22 November 2022)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
32500/2020
Judge
Phahlane
The respondent misled the applicant and the court by denying any intention to vacate the premises while actively securing and signing a new lease elsewhere. This conduct was dishonest and amounted to constructive contempt, causing the applicant to incur unnecessary legal costs in preparing for trial and related applications. The respondent failed to notify the applicant of its actions, and its opposition to the proceedings was a misuse of court process. The court found that the merits of the eviction application had become academic and that it was inappropriate to consider them further. In ex…
Matchett v Pretorius and Others (3119/2022) [2022] ZAKZPHC 60 (12 October 2022)
Court
Kwazulu-Natal High Court, Pietermaritzburg
Case number
3119/2022
Judge
Bezuidenhout
The court found that the applicant's conduct did not warrant a punitive costs order on an attorney and client scale. The withdrawal of the application was effected promptly after the answering affidavit was filed, and the subsequent setting down of the matter by respondents was solely for the determination of costs. The dispute arose from a domestic relationship and not a purely commercial transaction, and the accusations must be viewed in that context. There was no evidence of dishonesty, fraud, or scandalous matter in the affidavits. The court exercised its discretion and determined that on…