Davies v Shwatz and Others (38996/2019)
Davies v Shwatz and Others (38996/2019) [2019] ZAGPJHC 518 (10 December 2019)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish urgency as required by Rule 6(12) of the Uniform Rules of Court. The applicant did not demonstrate that he would be unable to obtain substantial redress in due course if the matter were not heard urgently. The claim relates to the purchase price of shares, not salary or maintenance, and the applicant's financial hardship does not justify urgent relief. Accordingly, the application was struck off the roll with costs.
Source excerpt
- Urgent Application
- Specific Performance
- Sale Of Shares
- Rule 6 12
- Purchase Price