Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
8 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2025] ZAGPPHC 735

Phumo and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions (2024/110053)

Phumo and Another v National Director of Public Prosecutions (2024/110053) [2025] ZAGPPHC 735 (21 July 2025)

The court declined to set aside a preservation order, finding service complaints unpersuasive and directing service on the remaining affected respondents.

  • Preservation Order
  • Multiplication Scheme
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Unlicensed Banking
  • Service Of Process
  • Urgent Motion
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2021] ZALMPPHC 24

Strydom N.O and Others v Brandt (4579/2019)

Strydom N.O and Others v Brandt (4579/2019) [2021] ZALMPPHC 24 (6 May 2021)

The High Court set aside payments made by insolvent Free Agape Enterprises to the defendant as dispositions without value under section 26 of the Insolvency Act.

  • Insolvency Act Section 26
  • Dispositions Without Value
  • Liquidation
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Onus Of Proof
  • Insolvency-act-section-26
Read case analysis
Banking And Finance [2017] ZAGPJHC 414

Khambule and Another v Registrar of Banks In re: Registrar of Banks v Khambule and Others (256009/14)

Khambule and Another v Registrar of Banks In re: Registrar of Banks v Khambule and Others (256009/14) [2017] ZAGPJHC 414 (17 November 2017)

The High Court dismissed an application to rescind a final sequestration order, finding no basis under rule 42(1) or rule 31(2)(b) and awarding punitive costs.

  • Sequestration
  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Unlawful Deposit Taking
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Default Judgment
  • Punitive Costs
Read case analysis
Banking And Finance [2017] ZAGPJHC 432

Khambule and Another v Registrar of Banks; In Re: Registrar of Banks v Khambule and Others (256007/14)

Khambule and Another v Registrar of Banks; In Re: Registrar of Banks v Khambule and Others (256007/14) [2017] ZAGPJHC 432 (17 November 2017)

The High Court dismissed Khambule’s rescission application against a final sequestration order, holding it was not granted in error or by default.

  • Sequestration
  • Rescission Of Judgment
  • Unlawful Deposit Taking
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Variation Of Order
  • Punitive Costs
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2013] ZAWCHC 155

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Mooi and Others (23596/2012)

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Mooi and Others (23596/2012) [2013] ZAWCHC 155 (18 October 2013)

The court held that while the value of property sought to be restrained may exceed the anticipated confiscation order, this is not an absolute bar to granting a restraint order. The respondents' argument that the order should be limited to the amounts directly received by them was rejected, as further evidence may emerge during the criminal trial regarding their involvement in a pyramid scheme. The court found that the applicant's proposed cap of R26,450,438.00 was unjustified, given the limited scope of the criminal charges and the lack of evidence of assets approaching this value. Instead,…

  • Prevention Of Organised Crime Act
  • Restraint Order
  • Confiscation Order
  • Syndicate Liability
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Asset Forfeiture
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2012] ZAECPEHC 51

Eastern Cape Society of Advocates v Jacobs (2232/2011)

Eastern Cape Society of Advocates v Jacobs (2232/2011) [2012] ZAECPEHC 51 (20 August 2012)

The High Court struck an advocate off the roll after a theft conviction, unprofessional handling of client funds, and other misconduct showing he was not fit to practise.

  • Striking Off Roll
  • Fit And Proper Person
  • Unprofessional Conduct
  • Trust Account Requirements
  • Criminal Conviction
  • Pyramid Scheme
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2011] ZASCA 70

Zwarts v Janse van Rensburg NO and Others (590/10)

Zwarts v Janse van Rensburg NO and Others (590/10) [2011] ZASCA 70 (25 May 2011)

The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal about repayments from a pyramid scheme liquidation, holding the appellant contracted with the companies, not Ms Prinsloo personally.

  • Company Liquidation
  • Voidable Disposition
  • Identification Of Debtor
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Insolvency Act Section 29
  • Company-liquidation
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2010] ZAGPPHC 149

Ramalho NO and Others v Potgieter (23133/09)

Ramalho NO and Others v Potgieter (23133/09) [2010] ZAGPPHC 149 (12 October 2010)

The High Court set aside payments made by Money Skills Limited to the defendant as unlawful dispositions and ordered repayment, interest, and costs.

  • Insolvent Disposition
  • Liquidation
  • Jurisdiction
  • Set Aside Payments
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Insolvent-disposition
Read case analysis
Banking And Finance [2010] ZAFSHC 63

Catharina and Another v Acker (4840/2005)

Catharina and Another v Acker (4840/2005) [2010] ZAFSHC 63 (1 July 2010)

The court found, on a balance of probabilities, that Noite Dia Trust operated an unlawful banking business by accepting deposits from the public without being registered as a bank, in contravention of section 11 of the Banks Act. The investment scheme constituted an unfair business practice as defined in the Consumer Affairs (Unfair Business Practices) Act and relevant regulations, specifically as a pyramid promotional scheme. All agreements entered into for investment purposes with the Trust were declared void ab initio. The court held that the hearsay evidence relied upon by the applicants…

  • Banking Act Violation
  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Unfair Business Practice
  • Nullity Of Contract
  • Hearsay Evidence
  • Motion Procedure
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2009] ZANCHC 52

Moodaley and Others v King (800/2008)

Moodaley and Others v King (800/2008) [2009] ZANCHC 52 (30 October 2009)

The court found that the contracts entered into by the plaintiffs with the defendant were part of an illegal pyramid scheme and thus void insofar as they purported to grant excessive interest. However, South African law allows recovery of the capital invested, even where the contract is tainted by illegality, provided the claim is not for the illegal interest. The plaintiffs were entitled to restitution of their capital investments, but not the usurious interest. The court awarded the plaintiffs repayment of their capital, less any amounts already repaid, and interest at a reasonable rate fro…

  • Pyramid Scheme
  • Illegal Contract
  • Restitution
  • Usurious Interest
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.