Esheria South Africa Case Law
Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Search and filter South Africa case law

Results update automatically as you type.

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2024] ZAWCHC 88

SA Legal Practice Council v Louw (10606/2023)

SA Legal Practice Council v Louw (10606/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 88 (20 March 2024)

Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
10606/2023
Judges
A G Binns-Ward, J Cloete

The court found that the respondent was not dishonest and had acted transparently and diligently in reporting and addressing the theft of trust funds by his employee. The deficit in the trust account was due to the employee's actions, not the respondent's misconduct. The LPC's refusal to issue a fidelity fund certificate was not justified under LPC rule 54.30, which allows for the issue of such a certificate if the practitioner provides a satisfactory explanation for a qualified audit and remains fit and proper. The court held that suspension and curatorship were not warranted in the absence…

Source excerpt

  • Legal Practitioners Fidelity Fund
  • Fit And Proper Person
  • Qualified Audit Report
  • Trust Account Deficit
  • Disciplinary Proceedings
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2020] ZAGPPHC 85

Selota v South African Legal Practice Council (85227/2019)

Selota v South African Legal Practice Council (85227/2019) [2020] ZAGPPHC 85 (9 March 2020)

Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
85227/2019
Judge
E Van Olst

The court found that the applicant failed to provide a satisfactory explanation and supporting documentation for the trust account irregularities, specifically the debit balances and journal entries. The audit report remained qualified, and the applicant did not comply with Rule 54.30 and Chapter 7 of the Legal Practice Act. The respondent was not satisfied that the trust account was in order, and the applicant did not follow the correct procedure by bringing a review application under PAJA. The court held that the applicant was not entitled to the relief sought and that his conduct warranted…

Source excerpt

  • Fidelity Fund Certificate
  • Legal Practice Act
  • Trust Account Irregularities
  • Qualified Audit Report
  • Administrative Action Review
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.