Nokotema v Road Accident Fund (5975/2023)
Nokotema v Road Accident Fund (5975/2023) [2025] ZAFSHC 150 (21 May 2025)
The court found that the plaintiff suffered significant but not permanent or disfiguring injuries, including severe traumatic brain injury, mood swings, headaches, and cognitive impairment. Expert evidence confirmed severe long-term mental and behavioural disturbance, but the plaintiff's recovery prospects are high, and his post-accident management was non-invasive. Comparison with Anthony v Road Accident Fund revealed that the plaintiff's injuries were less severe and did not warrant an equivalent award. The court rejected the post-hearing revision of the claimed quantum and assessed the ori…
Source excerpt
- Road Accident Fund Act
- General Damages
- Loss Of Earnings
- Expert Evidence
- Quantum Assessment