S.M.M v M.S.M (A301/17) [2018] ZAGPPHC 607 (8 May 2018)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
A301/17
Judges
A.M. Heystek, H. Fabricius
The court found that while there had been a material change in the respondent's financial circumstances, the appellant had not demonstrated sufficient reason for an increase in maintenance. The appellant's financial position had improved due to the division of the joint estate and pension payout, but she remained in need of maintenance and the respondent retained the means to pay according to the original order. The court held that the magistrate erred in suspending the maintenance order entirely, as the appellant's basic needs were still unmet by her investment income alone. However, the app…
C.S.S v P.M.S (CA334/15) [2016] ZAECGHC 68 (25 August 2016)
Court
Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
Case number
CA334/15
Judges
C Plasket, NG Beshe, MJ Lowe
The High Court upheld a R14,000 monthly spousal maintenance award after finding the former wife had proved need and that the trial court properly exercised its discretion.
Van Der Westhuizen v Van Der Westhuizen (55831/08) [2011] ZAGPPHC 30 (28 March 2011)
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Case number
55831/08
Judge
B.R. Southwood
Divorce judgment awarding the defendant lump-sum and monthly maintenance, with escalation, after finding her future income uncertain and the plaintiff able to pay.
L.M v G.J.M (10339/2006) [2009] ZAWCHC 137 (21 July 2009)
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Case number
10339/2006
Judge
Yekiso
High Court divorce judgment refusing post-divorce maintenance where the plaintiff failed to show extraordinary circumstances under section 7(2) of the Divorce Act.