S S v Road Accident Fund (42384/14) [2017] ZAGPJHC 457 (3 November 2017)
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Case number
42384/14
Judge
L Windell
The court dismissed a prescription special plea and held that the plaintiff’s late RAF 4 form did not bar a general damages claim where summons had been issued timeously.
Manukha v Road Accident Fund (285/2016) [2017] ZASCA 21; 2017 (4) SA 453 (SCA) (24 March 2017)
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Case number
285/2016
Judges
Leach, Tshiqi, Theron, Petse, Molemela
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the claim for non-pecuniary loss forms part of a unitary claim for compensation under the Road Accident Fund Act and does not constitute a separate and discrete claim. The late filing of the RAF4 form does not result in prescription of the claim for non-pecuniary loss, provided that the original claim (RAF1 form) was lodged and action was instituted within the statutory periods prescribed by s 23 of the Act. The regulations allow for the serious injury assessment report to be submitted separately, and there is no provision in the regulations for prescript…