Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional Law [2016] ZAGPPHC 45

Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (39171/2014)

Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (39171/2014) [2016] ZAGPPHC 45; [2016] 2 All SA 168 (GP); 2016 (4) SA 207 (GP) (3 February 2016)

Sections 34(1)(b) and (d) of the Immigration Act unconstitutionally limit the rights of detainees by failing to provide an automatic right to appear in person before a court to challenge the lawfulness of their detention and any extension thereof, as required by section 35(2)(d) of the Constitution. The limitation is not justified under section 36(1), as Home Affairs failed to provide any factual basis for the alleged administrative burden. The appropriate remedy is to declare the impugned provisions invalid to the extent of the limitation and to read in wording that ensures detainees are bro…

  • Immigration Detention
  • Judicial Oversight
  • Separation Of Powers
  • Reading In And Severance
  • Limitation Of Rights
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2008] ZASCA 47

S v Geldenhuys (470/2007)

S v Geldenhuys (470/2007) [2008] ZASCA 47; 2009 (1) SACR 1 (SCA); [2008] 3 All SA 8 (SCA); 2008 (9) BCLR 940 (SCA) (31 March 2008)

Sections 14(1)(b) and 14(3)(b) of the Sexual Offences Act 23 of 1957 are unconstitutional to the extent that they differentiate between heterosexual and same-sex sexual activities by setting the legal age of consent at 16 and 19 years, respectively. This distinction constitutes unfair discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, which is not justified under section 36(1) of the Constitution. The appropriate remedy is to sever the words 'under the age of 19 years' and read in 'under the age of 16 years' for both boys and girls, thereby setting a uniform age of consent. The declaration…

  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Age Of Consent
  • Unfair Discrimination
  • Constitutional Invalidity
  • Reading In And Severance
  • Children S Rights
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2003] ZACC 4

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Mohamed NO and Others (CCT44/02)

National Director of Public Prosecutions v Mohamed NO and Others (CCT44/02) [2003] ZACC 4; 2003 (1) SACR 561; 2003 (5) BCLR 476 ; 2003 (4) SA 1 (CC) (3 April 2003)

Section 38 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act does not preclude the High Court from issuing a rule nisi together with an interim preservation order. The phrase 'by way of an ex parte application' merely prescribes the initiating procedure and does not exclude the audi alteram partem principle. The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court and established common law practice permit the granting of interim orders and rules nisi to protect both the interests of the State and affected parties. The absence of explicit reference to a rule nisi in section 38 does not imply its exclusion, especia…

  • Fair Hearing Right
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Preservation Of Property Order
  • Remedial Orders
  • Reading In And Severance
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.