Sijila v S (CA & R93/2023)
Sijila v S (CA & R93/2023) [2024] ZAECMKHC 35 (19 March 2024)
The appeal court found that the record of proceedings in the court a quo was incomplete, lacking transcription of the vital portion relating to sentencing, and that the reconstruction was not properly conducted with input from all relevant parties. This inadequacy prevented a proper appraisal of the evidence on sentencing and rendered the proceedings unjust. The court held that the appellant's right to a fair trial and appeal was violated, as the record was insufficient for judicial review. Consequently, the appeal against sentence succeeded, and the sentence was set aside. The matter was rem…
Source excerpt
- Incomplete Record On Appeal
- Reconstruction Of Court Record
- Right To Fair Trial
- Sentencing Procedure