Daniels and Others v WP Rugby and another (15468/11)
Daniels and Others v WP Rugby and another (15468/11) [2011] ZAWCHC 481 (4 November 2011)
The court found that the disciplinary and appeal tribunal decisions of the first respondent constituted administrative action under PAJA, as the respondent exercised a public function affecting the rights of individuals. However, the applicants failed to establish any violation of the principles of natural justice or procedural fairness in the disciplinary process. The record showed that the first applicant was afforded a fair hearing, including the opportunity to present his case and appeal. The decision to order a hearing de novo was explicitly permitted by the bylaws, and no rights were vi…
Source excerpt
- Promotion Of Administrative Justice Act
- Natural Justice
- Domestic Tribunal Review
- Delay In Review
- Recusal Of Tribunal Member