Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative Law [2010] ZAKZPHC 23

Sizabonke Civils CC t/a Pilcon Projects v Zululand District Municipality and Others (2011 (4) SA 406 (KZP))

Sizabonke Civils CC t/a Pilcon Projects v Zululand District Municipality and Others (2011 (4) SA 406 (KZP)) [2010] ZAKZPHC 23; 10878/2009 (12 March 2010)

The court found that the tender process adopted by the first respondent was inconsistent with section 2(1)(b) of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, as it allocated less than the required minimum of 90 points for price by including functionality within those points. The impugned regulations, which permitted such inclusion, were held to be ultra vires and invalid as they conflicted with the statutory framework. The applicant was found to have locus standi, as it had a direct and substantial interest in the relief sought, both as a participant in the tender and as a future tender…

  • Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act
  • Ultra Vires
  • Legality Review
  • Municipal Tender Process
  • Regulation Invalidity
  • Locus Standi
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2007] ZACC 1

Engelbrecht v Road Accident Fund and Another (CCT57/06)

Engelbrecht v Road Accident Fund and Another (CCT57/06) [2007] ZACC 1; 2007 (6) SA 96 (CC); 2007 (5) BCLR 457 (CC) (6 March 2007)

Regulation 2(1)(c) of the Road Accident Fund Act regulations, which requires a claimant in a hit-and-run case to submit an affidavit to the police within 14 days after being in a position to do so, constitutes a limitation of the right of access to courts protected by section 34 of the Constitution. The 14-day period is unreasonably short and unfair, especially for the majority of claimants who are unlikely to be aware of the regulation. The double qualification ('if reasonably possible' and 'in a position to do so') does not sufficiently mitigate the harshness of the time limit. The responde…

  • Right Of Access To Courts
  • Road Accident Fund Act
  • Delegated Legislation
  • Limitation Of Rights
  • Regulation Invalidity
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.