Sign in
South Africa Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

South Africa Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

South Africa decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Labour Law [2020] ZALAC 56

NUM obo Majebe v Civil and General Contractors (PA6/19)

NUM obo Majebe v Civil and General Contractors (PA6/19) [2020] ZALAC 56; [2021] 4 BLLR 374 (LAC); (2021) 42 ILJ 1027 (LAC) (17 November 2020)

The Labour Appeal Court held that, following the majority judgment in Pieman’s Pantry, the Prescription Act applies to claims under the LRA, including arbitration awards for reinstatement and backpay, which constitute a 'debt' for prescription purposes. The referral of the dispute to the CCMA and the subsequent review application brought by the respondent interrupted the running of prescription. Since the review application had not been finalised, the arbitration award had not prescribed. The Labour Court erred in finding otherwise and dismissing the application to make the award an order of…

  • Prescription Act
  • Arbitration Award Enforcement
  • Review Application Interruption
  • Unfair Dismissal
  • Condonation
  • Reinstatement And Backpay
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

South Africa decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.