Ramatsekisa v Special Investigating Unit and Others (GP21/2023)
Ramatsekisa v Special Investigating Unit and Others (GP21/2023) [2025] ZAST 7 (17 March 2025)
The Tribunal found that the applicant failed to provide full and frank disclosure of his financial situation, including details of income from rental properties and proceeds from property sales, and showed reluctance to sell assets to meet expenses. The legislative framework, when interpreted harmoniously, empowers the Tribunal to grant interdictory relief to protect state assets, and the rules do not override the SIU Act. The applicant did not meet the requirements for release of preserved funds under rule 23(10), as he did not disclose all interests in property subject to the preservation o…
Source excerpt
- Preservation Order
- Release Of Preserved Funds
- Full And Frank Disclosure
- Ranking Of Creditors
- Statutory Interpretation
- Pension Fund Deductions