Van Rensburg NO and Another v Naidoo NO and Others, Naidoo NO and Others v Van Rensburg NO and Others (155/09, 455/09)
Van Rensburg NO and Another v Naidoo NO and Others, Naidoo NO and Others v Van Rensburg NO and Others (155/09, 455/09) [2010] ZASCA 68; [2010] 4 All SA 398 (SCA) ; 2011 (4) SA 149 (SCA) (26 May 2010)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the restrictive title deed conditions in favour of erf-holders are praedial servitudes and cannot be removed or altered by the MEC without proper delegation and due process. The MEC failed to consider written objections and did not prove lawful delegation of authority, rendering the removal decision invalid under PAJA. The Municipality's zoning regulations and guesthouse policy do not override restrictive conditions. The High Court, not sitting as a court of appeal or review, lacked power to suspend or nullify a final order of another court of equal juris…
Source excerpt
- Restrictive Title Conditions
- Removal Of Restrictions Act
- Praedial Servitude
- Administrative Action Under Paja
- Stay Of Execution
- Municipal Zoning